A jurisdiction that requires a detailed account of the basis of a lawsuit is requesting which type of pleading?

A jurisdiction requiring a detailed account of the basis of a lawsuit is calling for a fact pleading. Fact pleading demands that the party initiating the lawsuit provide specific facts that clearly outline the claims being made. This type of pleading goes beyond simply stating legal conclusions or general assertions; it requires a narrative that includes the who, what, where, and when of the case. This detailed account is essential for notifying the opposing party of the issues at stake and enables the court to understand the grounds of the lawsuit.

In contrast, notice pleading, which is common in many jurisdictions, typically requires less detail, focusing instead on providing enough information to give the opposing party notice of the claim without the necessity for exhaustive specifics. Conclusive pleading is not a recognized standard in legal practice for types of pleadings. An affidavit is a sworn statement used in various legal contexts but does not serve as a basis for commencing a lawsuit in itself, as it is typically used to present evidence rather than to outline the basis of a claim. Thus, fact pleading is the correct choice in jurisdictions that mandate a comprehensive account of the facts involved in the lawsuit.